24 questions across the six control pillars where regulated firms carry the most AI governance risk: policy, data and confidentiality, human oversight, regulatory posture, incident response, and identity, access and agent control.
No credit card. Your report comes on screen and by email.
No spam. 24 questions, about 4 minutes.
Pillar 1 of 6
Four questions per pillar. Answer honestly. The score is the sum of your answers, not an opinion.
This is the preview: your score, the pillar breakdown, and the top three gaps. The full audit unlocks below. It includes every gap, every quick win, the governance deliverable that closes each one, and a 15-minute call with Brandon to pressure-test the report.
The full report lists every gap across all six control pillars. It names the governance deliverable that closes each one and hands you a Quick Wins list you can act on this week. You also get a downloadable PDF of your report and a live call with Brandon to pressure-test the findings against your specific regulatory posture.
Free, and emailed to you. The booking link for your call is sent with the report.
View my full report →Treat this as a working scope document. It is what we would use as the basis for a Governance Install engagement.
If you engage a Governance Install, here is how we would sequence the fix so the highest-risk gaps close first and nothing ships without evidence behind it.
Weeks 1 to 2 . Ratify
Stop the exposure
Adopt a ratified, firm-branded AI use policy and a one-page sanctioned-tools list. Survey staff for shadow AI so you can see what is actually in use with firm and client data. Name one owner for AI governance with defined responsibilities. Target: a written policy in force and a named owner by the end of Week 2.
Weeks 3 to 8 . Control
Scope the data, screen the rules
Move off consumer AI accounts onto business-tier tools under a BAA or DPA scoped to your field. Define which data classes may enter which tools. Map your AI uses against your field's rules (Bar advertising, HIPAA, SEC, fair housing) and screen for automated-decision (ADMT) exposure. Build a use-case registry with named owners and risk classifications.
Weeks 9 to 13 . Prove
Make governance provable, then review on a cadence
Assemble a Trust Binder: charter, registry, risk classifications, and records that show the policy is followed, not just written. Stand up an audit log and grounding or egress checks for sensitive outputs. Put governance on a calendar with a set review cadence and an owner, so it keeps pace with how you actually use AI. This is the evidence a regulator or auditor would ask to see.
Schedule your 15-minute call with Brandon.
We pressure-test the gaps live, talk through which governance deliverables matter most for your posture, and sketch the remediation sequence. No additional charge.
The next rung is the Founder-Led AI Growth Audit, AI Stack & Policy focus ($97): Brandon turns this report into a written, prioritized remediation memo, naming the specific governance deliverable that closes each gap. From there you climb only as far as you need: the $500 AI Use Policy Kit (our policy template for your profession, with a founder review of your draft), the $3,500 Executive AI Intensive (two sessions where your leadership decides posture, policy, and priorities, with ten written deliverables), and the 90-Day CAIO Bootstrap from $5,000 (baseline governance installed). At the top, a Governance Install turns the report into governance in force: a ratified policy, a sanctioned stack, a use-case registry, risk classifications, and a Trust Binder that holds up to an exam. Each step is priced on its own. Scoped to your field's rules (Bar, HIPAA, SEC, fair housing).
Book the $97 Stack & Policy Audit
See every step on the governance path, including the $1,500 In-Office AI Policy Workshop.
For informational and educational purposes only
This assessment produces automated, directional results based on the information you provide and the current version of our scoring rubric. Outputs are educational and informational only, not guarantees, predictions of outcome, or professional advice. Results can change between runs as the rubric or scan data is updated. This tool is not a substitute for advice from a licensed professional in your jurisdiction. Nothing produced by this tool is legal, medical, tax, financial, or investment advice. AI-generated content in this tool (including any narrative summary written by a large language model) may be inaccurate, incomplete, or out of date; verify anything you plan to act on with a licensed professional in your jurisdiction. AI assistants (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Claude) independently determine which firms or sources they cite. No vendor can guarantee specific AI outputs, citation frequency, or search rankings. By using this tool you acknowledge these limitations.
Not legal or compliance advice. Aday Interactive, Inc. is a technology firm, not a law firm or a compliance consultancy. This automated check is for informational purposes only, does not determine compliance with any law or framework, and does not create a professional relationship. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or reviewed by any regulator. AI governance spans your field's own rules (for example the rules of your Bar, HHS/OCR for HIPAA, the SEC for advisers, or HUD for fair housing); confirm specifics with your own counsel.
References. This check is grounded in published frameworks, not our opinion. Verify the current text at the source: NIST AI Risk Management Framework · HHS HIPAA · SEC Marketing Rule · HUD Fair Housing.