Help your firm respond faster, communicate more clearly, and stay on safer compliance footing online.

In plain English: the intake agent captures potential-client details safely, never gives legal advice, and surfaces the required disclosures every time. The mechanics: prompts are engineered around Chapter 4-7 — no guarantees or predictions of results (Rule 4-7.13(b)(1)), no unverifiable "specialist" claims outside board certification (Rule 4-7.14(a)(4)), contingency-fee cost disclosure baked into any hero or CTA that references contingency work (Rule 4-7.14(a)(7)), and the required admissions disclosure surfaced sitewide (Rule 4-7.12). We treat the Fla. Bar Website Advertising Checklist as the source of truth and stamp every deployment against the current revision.

Yes. The agent captures only what your firm needs to run a conflicts check (opposing party, matter type, jurisdiction) and routes that payload into your conflicts system before the qualifying conversation continues. Prompts avoid legal-advice-adjacent language; nothing the agent says is advice, and every transcript is retained for the period your conflicts policy requires.

Plain-English payoff: your PI pages read like a firm that knows its own rules — no red-flag phrases that get you flagged in a Bar review. The mechanics: prior "no fee unless you win" wording is replaced with Rule-4-1.5(f)-safe language ("No attorney's fees unless we recover for you") plus explicit cost-handling disclosure that matches your actual practice (firm advances vs. client pays costs on no recovery). Hero, meta description, footer, and any FAQ answer that mentions contingency work all carry the same disclosure, so a Bar reviewer sees a consistent story across every surface.

Short answer: yes, and the technical work is what makes it possible. What we build: canonical LegalService entity with dual-jurisdiction support if applicable, per-page FAQPage schema whose answers match your visible content verbatim, Person schema with hasCredential (Florida Bar, board certifications, second-jurisdiction admissions), BreadcrumbList on inner pages, and FAQ content cited to specific Florida Statute section numbers rather than hand-wavy summaries. Named statutes are the mechanical difference between AI-invisible and AI-cited legal content. Read our GEO plain-English guide.

In one line: a $14.97 self-service diagnostic that surfaces the compliance gaps and AI-visibility issues you should fix first. What you get: a compliance score against the Fla. Bar Website Advertising Checklist, the top 3 rule-labeled gaps on your specific site, and a downloadable branded PDF report you can bring to your ethics counsel or managing partner. Use it either as a stand-alone read (before deciding to engage) or as the entry point to our Founder-Led AEO Audit + Fix engagement — the $14.97 credits toward that engagement. Start the audit.

Yes. Common for Florida attorneys who are also admitted in Texas, New York, or Georgia. We build the second jurisdiction's Bar rules module (3–5 days of prep for Texas Rule 7 series and Interpretative Comment 17, less for other states with narrower advertising rules) and produce dual-jurisdiction schema, admissions disclosure, and FAQ content on the same site. Under ABA Model Rule 8.5, the stricter rule controls; the site content, schema, and disclosure language reflect that.

Aday Interactive, Inc. is headquartered at 338 Minorca Avenue, Suite 202, Coral Gables, FL 33134, two blocks from Miracle Mile in the heart of the Coral Gables legal-services corridor. We work with solo and boutique firms across Coral Gables, Brickell, Coconut Grove, South Miami, Pinecrest, Key Biscayne, and broader Miami-Dade, with remote delivery for firms statewide.