AI for Coral Gables Law Firms

In plain English: the intake agent captures potential-client details safely. It never gives legal advice, and it shows the required disclosures every time. The mechanics: every prompt is built around Chapter 4-7. No guarantees or predictions of results (Rule 4-7.13(b)(1)). No unverifiable "specialist" claims outside board certification (Rule 4-7.14(a)(4)). Contingency-fee cost disclosure is built into any hero or CTA that mentions contingency work (Rule 4-7.14(a)(7)). The required admissions disclosure appears sitewide (Rule 4-7.12). We treat the Fla. Bar Website Advertising Checklist as the source of truth. Every deployment is stamped against the current revision.

Yes. The agent captures only what your firm needs for a conflicts check: opposing party, matter type, and jurisdiction. It sends that data to your conflicts system before the qualifying conversation continues. Prompts steer clear of anything close to legal advice. Nothing the agent says is advice. Every transcript is kept for the period your conflicts policy requires.

Plain-English payoff: your PI pages read like a firm that knows its own rules. No red-flag phrases that get you flagged in a Bar review. The mechanics: old "no fee unless you win" wording is replaced with Rule-4-1.5(f)-safe language ("No attorney's fees unless we recover for you"). We add a clear cost-handling disclosure that matches your actual practice: the firm advances costs, or the client pays costs if there is no recovery. The hero, meta description, footer, and every FAQ answer that mentions contingency work carry the same disclosure. A Bar reviewer sees one consistent story across every surface.

Short answer: yes, and the technical work is what makes it possible. What we build: a canonical LegalService entity, with dual-jurisdiction support if you need it. Per-page FAQPage schema whose answers match your visible content word for word. Person schema with hasCredential (Florida Bar, board certifications, second-jurisdiction admissions). BreadcrumbList on inner pages. FAQ content that cites specific Florida Statute section numbers instead of vague summaries. Named statutes are the mechanical difference between AI-invisible and AI-cited legal content. Read our GEO plain-English guide.

In one line: a free self-service check that shows the advertising-rule gaps to fix first. What you get: a score against ABA Model Rules 7.1 to 7.3 and, for Florida firms, the Fla. Bar Website Advertising Checklist. Every rule-labeled gap on your specific site, with the suggested fix. A downloadable PDF report you can bring to your ethics counsel or managing partner. Use it as a stand-alone read before deciding to engage. Start the check.

Yes. Florida attorneys are often admitted in a second state. We build to the Florida Bar's advertising rules (Rules 4-7.11 through 4-7.22) and the ABA Model Rules on lawyer advertising (Rules 7.1 to 7.3) first, then add the second state's rules as a separate module during prep. We then produce dual-jurisdiction schema, admissions disclosure, and FAQ content on the same site. Under ABA Model Rule 8.5, the stricter rule controls. The site content, schema, and disclosure language reflect that.

Aday Interactive, Inc. is headquartered at 338 Minorca Avenue, Suite 202, Coral Gables, FL 33134. That is two blocks from Miracle Mile, in the heart of the Coral Gables legal-services corridor. We work with solo and boutique firms across Coral Gables, Brickell, Coconut Grove, South Miami, Pinecrest, Key Biscayne, and broader Miami-Dade. We also deliver remotely for firms statewide.